Trump Shares Fake Historian Memo Comparing His Power to Hitler and Stalin
Donald Trump is facing fresh criticism after saying he has found “no limits” to his presidential power and sharing a bizarre memo that compared him with some of history’s most notorious rulers.

The controversy began after Trump discussed the reach of his power in a new interview, arguing that world leaders now understand his authority and influence. His comments came after a dramatic foreign policy stretch involving Iran, Israel and the G7 summit.
Trump then promoted a document on Truth Social that claimed he may be more powerful than figures such as Attila the Hun, Genghis Khan, Napoleon, Stalin, Mao and Adolf Hitler.

The memo argued that those historical figures were limited by geography, technology and military logistics, while Trump’s power reaches across the modern global economy, media, military systems and international politics.
Trump described the author, Dave King, as a “presidential historian.” But reporting tied to the forthcoming book “Regime Change” by Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan says King is not an academic historian. Instead, he is reportedly a longtime caddy and personal confidant of golf legend Gary Player.

That detail quickly turned the memo into a political punchline. Critics mocked Trump for embracing praise from a non-historian, while others said the comparison to authoritarian rulers was deeply disturbing regardless of who wrote it.
Axios reported that Trump appeared pleased by the document and had previously shown it to Haberman and Swan during an interview. The authors wrote that Trump seemed comfortable placing himself in a lineage of leaders associated with conquest, fear and domination.
The White House has not backed away from Trump’s promotion of the document. Trump’s supporters argue that the memo was about global influence, not moral comparison, and say critics are overreacting to a political metaphor.

But Democrats and anti-Trump commentators say the episode fits a broader pattern of Trump describing presidential power in unusually sweeping terms. They argue that his “no limits” language raises serious concerns about checks and balances.
The controversy also comes as Trump faces criticism over his handling of Iran, his comments about allies and his increasingly dominant tone toward both foreign leaders and Republicans who oppose his policies.
Whether seen as a joke, flattery or a warning sign, the memo has become another flashpoint in the debate over Trump’s view of presidential power.